Information Analysis

Evaluating...

Evaluating…

When searching for useful, high quality information using academic databases, as opposed to Google, some information analysis is already done for you.  Firstly, most documents that appear are professionally published articles, and secondly, to guarantee high quality, most databases I used, such as ProQuest and A+ Education, allow the user to limit the search to peer-reviewed articles only.  Most databases also highlighted my search terms in the summary or abstract, so I could quickly get  an idea of relevance to my information need.  Google required a bit more effort, in terms of determining relevance, availability and quality, as the documents encompassed a much greater range, including blogs, slideshows and unreliable websites.  All documents found in my annotated bibliography are sources I judged to be relevant, useful and of high quality.

Analysis and evaluation of information is a crucial stage in the information seeking process, but there are many guides and models available to help with this task.  I chose to use the CRAP test (currency, reliability, authority, purpose), because it encompasses Kuhlthau, Maniotes and Caspari’s concepts for evaluating sources (expertise, accuracy, currency, perspective, quality) (2007, p.85), and it is easy and fun to remember, so I think it would work well with the high school students I teach.  Below, I will set out two  examples of using the CRAP test with some online sources I found during my search for inquiry learning in middle / high school Geography.

This Glogster was created by Dianne McKenzie and is used here with permission. Retrieved from http://libguides.tigs.nsw.edu.au/content.php?pid=234350&sid=1939059

1. GeogSpace

Screen Shot 2013-09-04 at 11.01.48 AM

2. Article: FitzGerald, The Twin Purposes of Guided Inquiry

Screen Shot 2013-09-04 at 11.07.46 AM

Table showing information analysis/evaluation using CRAP test:

CRAP test sample

References

Australian Geography Teachers Association (2013). GeogSpace. Retrieved from http://www.geogspace.edu.au/support-units/

Fitzgerald, L. (2011). The twin purposes of Guided Inquiry: Guiding student inquiry and evidence based practice. Scan, 30(1), 26-41.

The Illawarra Grammar School (2013, May 28). CRAP Test – Evaluating Information. Retrieved from http://libguides.tigs.nsw.edu.au/content.php?pid=234350&sid=1939059

Kuhlthau, C. C., Caspari, A. K., & Maniotes, L. K. (2007). Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century. Westport, Conn: Libraries Unlimited.

Advertisements

1 Comment (+add yours?)

  1. banjodog2013
    Sep 10, 2013 @ 09:09:05

    Kelly your page is engaging, interesting and informative. You orientate your reader well by establishing the perameters of the data bases, their benefits and Google’s limitations. You positioned me well for the seguay into C.R.A.P. and like you I think that the C.R.A.P. test is the most easily remembered by our senior students for obvious reasons. I particularly like the way it makes students reflect on the purpose and the way they are positioned. Your analysis table is clear and succinct and your inclusion of Fitzgerald’s article is great, providing your reader with direct access to the material you are refering to. Your page design is clear and uncluttered. Thank you for providing a useful tool uncluttered with unneccessary text and commentary.

    I think you have done well here.

    Juliette

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: